|
Tajikistan
by Candide
Aryan summit
Billed with pride by the Tajik press as the
“First Aryan Summit”, Tajikistan invited Karzai and Ahmedinejad to
Dushanbe to discuss Aryan (read: Iranian in the broader sense) issues and
economic cooperation. The residents of Dushanbe tended not to notice
anything except the cancellation of regularly scheduled television
programming and the closure of all roads to prepare for parades and to
re-pave the roads.

06.07.2006
Tajikistan’s official currency is the
Somoni, which is equal to 100 Dirhams. Notes come in 100 Somoni, 50
Somoni, 20 Somoni, 10 Somoni, 5 Somoni, 1 Somoni, 50 Dirhams, 20
Dirhams, and 5 Dirhams.
They also have coins which, I am told, are
being phased in (they are already in circulation and have been for some
time, but are supposed to increase) as 20 and 5 Dirham notes are being
phased out. Anyway, that’s what we heard at the internet cafe from the
lady who refused to take 20 Dirham notes in change. Coins come in 50
Dirhams, 25 Dirhams (???), 20 Dirhams, 10 Dirhams, and 5 Dirhams. I have
seen a 1 Dirham coin once, I think, but I’m not sure.
I personally prefer the coins, since the
marshrutkas and trolleys (electric buses) cost 40 Dirhams and buses cost
30 Dirhams, so most Dirhams are in constant, fevered circulation and
fall apart pretty quickly. Usually while in my posession, though
possibly this is because I let them float around in the bottom of my
purse until nearly disintegrated, when I suddenly try to pull them out
from underneath something to pay for my marshrutka ride. So I’m all for
the change.
But the putting of 20-Dirham coins into
circulation and removal of 20-Dirham notes from circulation has had a
significant effect on my (and thousands’ of others) daily lives, because
it seems that they are taking the notes out of circulation more quickly
than they are putting the coins in. Maybe it just seems this way, but I
feel there is a serious lack of change in the city.
Keeping in mind that the most common notes
under 1 Somoni are the 20 Dirhams (the cheaper local ice-cream cone also
costs 20 Dirhams, by the way), most things are priced so as to ensure
that change is available. Unfortunately, lately, whenever buying things
that require 20 Dirhams in change, or worse, 40 Dirhams, I have been
reimbursed with bags of tea or small pieces of candy at an “equivalent”
value. Though, obviously, since I don’t eat stale Turkish mints or drink
black tea and since I cannot use these as currency on marshrutki, I don’t
really feel the market value very relevant to my personal situation. And
it’s not only me.
Lately, instead of giving 60 Dirhams in
change for the 40 Dirham ride on transport, some marshrutka conductors
have started giving 50 Dirham notes, without any explanation. If someone
protests, the conductor will say, “Okay, you can wait for change, but we
don’t have any. 50 Dirhams or nothing, what can I do?” I have never seen
a single person on the marshrutka offer to make change, probably because
there is nobody who can do it. Everyone hoards his or her 20 Dirham
notes so as not to be cheated in a similar way. Likewise, if you pay
with a 50 Dirham note, you are not likely to get 10 Dirhams back unless
you ask.
And then of course there are those bizarre
20 Dirham notes. I’m not sure if they are on their way in or on their
way out, but if you should pay 45 Dirhams for a ride on public transport,
you can forget about getting the 5 Dirhams back as change. Most of us
assume that either the conductor (usually a very poor person) will keep
the money if he manages to keep any extra, or that he will be forced to
give out 25 Dirhams instead of 20 to someone who needs change. The
latter is much more likely, and anyway, the conductor is not likely to
save up more than one Somoni per day. Only the poorest people insist on
the 5 Dirhams change back, therefore.
Yesterday, in an interesting turn of
events, I saw a woman pay 30 Dirhams for the marshrutka. The conductor
said, “What is this? It’s 40 Dirhams for the ride.” She replied,
“Yesterday you gave me 50 Dirhams in change for a one-Somoni note, and
so today, take your own medicine.” I wonder if the 20-Dirham coins will
come into circulation before this becomes a city-wide phenomenon.
Tajikistan
by Candide

20.06.2006
Right now, I’m living with my in-laws in
their apartment far from the center of Dushanbe. I have learned some
very interesting things about Tajik solidarity groups in urban areas
during my time here.
Generally,
solidarity groups in Muslim cultures are organized around the mosque, or
masjed. Every 20 to 25 families, which in a rural area would compose
about one block of houses in a village, has its own mosque. Then each
village would have one large “Friday” mosque, which is the central
mosque. This is the case in rural Tajikistan as well, and even in
Uzbekistan, although there the government has bureaucratized the
institution. In Tajikistan, this area is coterminous with the mahallah
in most cases.
The regular mosque group is often (in
rural areas) composed of mainly relatives, by marriage and blood. This
is only part of a larger solidarity group, the qawm, which is very
important to most Persians. Qawm is kind of like tribe, but among Tajiks
is much more regional than related to blood.
Now, in rural areas, all of these
things- mosque, qawm, family, and tribe, overlap. In urban areas, they
often do not.
My brother in law attends a mosque with
what appears to be at least 100 other families (my estimation is based
on watching people going in and out- if there are two entrances, though
I don’t think there are- forget it). His own extended family lives in a
neighbourhood that is a 25-minute car ride, or one-hour ride on public
transport, away. His qawm (which incidentally, does not transfer to his
wife- she maintains ties with her own family for solidarity and support)
does not overlap with his mosque, but consists of people belonging to
his tiny ethnic minority group from Zafarobod, the Dushanbe contingent
of which mainly live in the same neighbourhood (mahallah) as his parents.
Likewise, his mosque does not overlap
with his neighbourhood. Although the mosque is localized- I’m not sure
exactly which apartment blocks it serves but I believe there are about
four or five- his neighbourhood, which would normally be coterminous
with his mosque- apparently consists of his pod’yezd.
Pod’yezd is a Russian word which means,
roughly, entrance. Each apartment building has a certain number of
entrances, which lead to the apartments. In most five-storey apartment
buildings, there are ten apartments per pod’yezd, which (due to the size
of the apartments) corresponds to the number of families.
Now, normally in Tajik culture, if you
have a wedding or circumcision or a wake or something, you would invite
everyone from the mahallah, or your regular mosque. In rural areas, this
tradition holds. I’ve been to a number of weddings where the whole
mosque, plus remaining extended family, are there. It comes to about a
hundred families.
In urban areas, however, people only
have small apartments and usually cannot have the wedding on the street.
You can’t just disturb traffic, in the first place, and in the second
place, eventually you all have to go inside. Finally, it’s really
expensive to live in the city, and expensive to host all of those
people. So when you have guests you just invite the people from your
pod’yezd. You can invite more, but it’s considered neighbourly to invite
at least the eight or twelve families with whom you share an entrance.
You would invite them all whenever you have a party, and whoever comes,
comes.
Some people don’t go, though most do,
because after all, most women are poor housewives, and never get the
chance to out to restaurants. This is their big chance to get cleaned up
and put on some makeup with a purpose, and sit without the kids and
relax.
This is unlike a rural environment,
where you would have more of a social obligation to go, not least
because you are almost certainly related to the person inviting you in
some way. If you don’t go, I believe that the normal retribution is to
gossip incessantly about you, accusing you of being sick, an adulteress,
or of giving people the evil eye or God knows what else.
Now, the reason I got very interested
in the pod’yezd is that, as I wrote recently, I am soon moving into a
nine-storey apartment building, each floor of each pod’yezd of which has
four apartments. That means 36 apartments in my pod’yezd. This was
somewhat worrying, because although our apartment is relatively large
for a Soviet apartment, it is still only 65 square meters or so. And I’ll
want to invite them all on some pretext or other pretty soon, to get on
good terms, just in case I ever need to borrow a cup of flour in the
future or something.
Fortunately, on discussing the subject
with my sister-in-law, I learned that in a nine-storey apartment, I am
only obligated to invite my four floor-mates, and not the entire pod’yezd.
So apparently, the pod’yezd is a kind of fluid concept. You have to
invite your closest neighbours, is the idea, but since these people don’t
overlap with any solidarity group, there is nothing very obligatory in
it.
So in fact I have saved myself trouble
by moving into a nine-storey building. I only have to invite my three
other floor-mates and that’s it. What a relief.
13.06.2006
1) People who dress up like hajjis (a
hajji is someone who has been to Mecca on the hajj, or pilgrimage)
before going out begging, and on a related note, women who wear the
hijab especially for begging.
Why do I hate this? If they are not hajjis,
it’s a disgusting abuse of religion. On the one hand I would like to
believe this is the case. But I’m afraid that some people are also
sincere, and want to show passers-by, “Look, I’m a good person, I am a
hajji, give me money.” As if that’s what God wants you to do: go on a
pilgrimage, spend all your money that way, and then spend the rest of
your life begging to make up for it. I specifically do not give to the
ones who dress up like this, or who say prayers for money. In the first
place they get a lot from the other suckers and in the second place,
listen, I’ll pay for your food, or even your drugs, not your white
freaking turban so you can get your extra credits from God. How many
people work their whole lives to support their families and never go on
hajj, though they would like to???
2) The fact that you cannot buy anything
made for women that does not have sparklies attached to it (sequins,
beads, glitter, whatever).
Actual conversation I had in a boutique
today:
“Do you have something that goes with
these pants? Something light and simple?”
“What about this?”
“Mmmm… that’s a bit bright. Do you have something without sparklies?”
“No. Sorry.”
“Oh…”
3) No mustard on hot dogs.
Instead, you get pickled carrot salad,
mayonnaise, and ketchup. I actually eat these anyway, which if proof
that some people can adapt to anything.
The first one was what was really bugging
me, though. We were on a marshrutka and some old guy dressed up like a
mullah comes up to the bus and says this loud prayer for our safety.
What is paradoxical about this is that many Muslims (especially in
Tajikistan) technically believe that if you are bad, bad things happen
to you on this earth. (How they reconcile this with America’s wealth and
the Muslim world’s extreme poverty is beyond me but anyway.)
So many people say, “Oh, she’s begging,
she must have done something wrong.” This is only slightly different
from the Western justification for not giving to beggars (”They’ll just
spend it on alcohol/drugs anyway…” / “Get a job!” etc.).
But if the mullah, or a hajji, is begging,
then suddenly- what? He must be good because he’s wearing a turban? How
can a mullah or hajji possibly become a beggar? And if these “good”
people can become beggars, then surely other good people can become
beggars? Am I missing something?
I don’t think there’s anything equivalent
to this in the West… is there?
Oh yeah, and now that I think of it, one
more:
4) Telephone manners.
When we were in Russia, we were taught
proper telephone manners. I’m not sure if this just never got to
Tajikistan or if Persians have a totally different idea of the telephone,
but telephone manners here are horrible.
A typical telephone conversation I have:
“Allo?”
“JAMSHED KANI?” Can I get Jamshed?
(They always shout, because they believe you cannot hear them
otherwise.)
“Salom aleykum. Jamshed nadorem, shumo ishtiboh karded.” Hello. There’s
no Jamshed here, you’ve got the wrong number.
Click.
Phone rings again in 30 seconds.
“Allo, zdravstvuyte.” Hello.
(I switch to Russian so that the conversation will go on my terms and
not be limited by my horrible Persian.)
“JAMSHED KANI?”
“Nyet, zdes’ nyet nikakovo Jamsheda. Vy nye tuda popali.” No, there is
no Jamshed here. You have the wrong number.
Click.
Phone rings again in 30 seconds.
“Allo, zdravstvuyte.”
“JAMSHED KANI?”
(In Russian) “Do you speak Russian?”
“Da.”
“Listen mister, you keep calling me here, but you have got the wrong
number. You never even said hello! Check the number and don’t call this
number again.”
Same person rings my phone every five
minutes for the next six hours. Generally, I don’t answer.
Another common telephone conversation:
Ring.
“Allo, salom aleykum.” Hello.
“Ki ay?” Who’s this?
“SALOM ALEYKUM.” HELLO.
“IN KI AY?” Who is this?
“SHUMO SALOM ALEYKUM NA GUYED???”COULD YOU SAY HELLO?
I don’t answer my in-laws’ phone like that,
but God knows I’d like to.
| |
|